>>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > In particular, I was thinking we could reuse this syntax:
> || ( A:= B:= ) > to express any-of dependencies that do not support runtime switching > of providers -- since that is pretty much what := does to slots. > This would save us from creating a new syntax like '||= ()' [1]. Please don't, because it makes things pretty much unreadable. If you want an operator like || ( ) but without runtime switching, then define one (e.g., <<= or ||= as suggested in [1]), but don't try to inherit properties from its children. An EAPI bump will be required in any case. Ulrich > [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489458
pgpi_HleMY59Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
