El lun, 04-08-2014 a las 18:03 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: > Hi everyone, > > The ppc and ppc64 team members just had a meeting. One of our main > issues was reconstituting those teams because they were in a state of > disorganization. We've come up with a plan to move forward and address > Pacho's original concern about ppc/ppc64 falling behind. Here's what we > came up with: > > 1. We elected jmorgan as the lead for both ppc and ppc64. He's our > point person for any ppc/ppc64 related issues. > > 2. If you are interested in helping out, whether you are a current team > member or not, please speak up! There are people formally listed as > part of the ppc/ppc64 herds, but there's so much inactivity, we'd like > to know who's going to be active. Of course we understand there is this > thing called "real life" but there is a difference between a little help > and no involvement at all. We are considering culling the team members > accordingly. (/me hides!) > > 3. We are going to try to keep ppc and ppc64 going as it has been, with > the usual STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ. We think we can do it without > overloading ourselves, especially if we get help. We do have a shared > ppc64 system. The bigger problem is actually KEYWORDREQ's so we are > going to request maintainers not ever drop ~ppc or ~ppc64 even when they > feel a major bump has occurred, eg a deep rewrite to a library. We know > this is living dangerously but we'll going to make use of the community > in this regard --- either someone will bug us on a broken ~ppc/~ppc64 > package, or we'll catch it at stabilization. > > We'll try to move ppc/ppc64 chatter to those lists, but it was important > that everyone know where we're at. >
Then, you will finally try to keep current stable tree as big as current :/? (I am referring only to stable tree, not about dropping keywording entirely that wasn't ever the plan)
