2014-08-17 22:56 GMT+04:00 Maxim Koltsov <maksbo...@gentoo.org>: > For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4 > and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to > hearing Qt team opinion.
I second this opinion (especially after porting a few libraries' ebuilds to multibuild to support qt5 builds). I don't know, though, how (and whether it's possible) to automate sed'ing the library names in qmake/cmake/whatever build system, since you'll have to have different ones for qt4 and qt5 builds. -- Georg Rudoy
