Dnia 2014-12-07, o godz. 04:43:05 Daniel Campbell <cont...@sporkbox.us> napisał(a):
> > If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. > > I'd appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things > > i've already listed as missing :). Any further comments will be > > very helpful in deciding on the way forward. > > > > If there is a real interest in my fork, I will probably move it to > > gx86 as sys-devel/gcc-mgorny. I will also be happy to work on > > replacing the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. > > With QA process against toolchain.eclass if necessary. > > As a user, what would adopting this do? For instance I run ~amd64 > multilib and have had quite a time dealing with the recent multilib > changes (specifically with Humble Bundle games). Would you recommend > helping you test this simplified and/or cleaned up toolchain on one's > primary system, or is it better off for more specific systems that > don't need to be as versatile as a multi-purpose desktop machine? I wouldn't run it on production system, or when you need crossdev with 4.9.2. If you're on Hardened or some less common system, I wouldn't try it as the primary compiler. Also, best if you have a backup gcc or binary package you can downgrade to (quickpkg --include-configs=y gcc). That said, I'm running it on all my ~amd64 and ~x86 systems and it works. I've rebuilt all packages on my devbox using it and nothing (new) failed. However, I didn't try building it using <gcc-4.8. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
pgpweEuQ2mrd0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
