-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/21/2014 03:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
> 
> the following is a comment Mike made about the status of glibc in
> an earlier thread on this list:
> 
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 09:16:52AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> upstream glibc has dropped support for older Linux kernels.  your
>> choices: - upgrade your kernel - switch to a different C library 
>> - stick with glibc-2.19 for a while
>> 
>> be warned though there are no plans atm to backport things to
>> glibc-2.19. this includes security fixes, but more importantly as
>> time moves on, making newer gcc versions sanely compile glibc.
>> we've kept older glibc versions around to be nice, and on a part
>> time basis for cross-compiling, but none of those are given
>> priority.  i.e. fixes come as people feel like doing them.
>> 
>> certainly once glibc-2.20+ goes stable, there is no expectation
>> let alone requirement that packages in the tree be kept working
>> with older glibc versions.  the maintenance cost there is
>> unreasonable.
>> 
>> i guess if you're stuck on old crap, now would be a good time to
>> start preparing to unstick your crap.  glibc-2.20 will most
>> likely be in ~arch in the next 6 months. -mike
> 
> Since glibc-2.19-r1 is stable everywhere, what I want to know is
> whether we can remove versions *prior* to 2.19-r1 at this point.
> 
> If we do, that makes it easy to fix bug 478764 [1], because there
> would only be three versions of glibc we have to worry about.
> 
> thoughts?
> 
> William
> 
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478764
> 

I suppose it makes sense to drop old glibc ebuilds.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=
=rlNJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to