On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > > I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable > > makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with > > bug/security fixes is released. > > > > Isn't our current rate of stabilization "selling" a promise of > > stability we can't stand behind? > > > > Mike > > Well to be perfectly honest, the current-stable 3.16 and 3.17 kernels > for me at least have some rather unfortunate regressions over 3.15 and > previous, so even with the stabilization we're achieving now I don't > think we're living up to our "promise of stability" :)
Exactly. It may give people a warm fuzzy feeling, but it's not like other packages. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead - Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index
