-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/07/2015 07:48 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/07/2015 07:22 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:11 PM, William Hubbs >> <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
... > > > My two cents is that this is particularly true for kernel sources. > For other applications GLSAs will take over the responsibility for > the mask to ensure an upgrade path, however as we don't currently > have a structured mechanism for kernels I support the mask > personally. > Adding on to this. If we follow up from the earlier thread on kernel series stabilization. Could it be an idea to keep package masks for LTS branches of the kernel at least, but as a <= rather than specific kernel versions. As such this could be updated when new bugs are announced without clobbering the p.masks file going forwards? - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUrZQcAAoJEPw7F94F4TagvT0P+wWHaz+//eOTehjbSEblJsSH KsFxeUOpqJmuid82T2i5Ec1WtZZWG+KXh+I46zWgvyYMSKPi7/YC2S21vl9hhflX HP7NXmvS2G9/Wi7JfVpNyxX4gMZI8Oksm0ZHg5PNr9sQmLWV56eTib4U7RdtODl5 T7CwZ/Rew8gyf9tTI7T6VNM7+inyMpjaFy3v0eD4EPkRw/ZB7tPWWLrDN0yN70Lw w8cm0SPEXuuVB80OegAsf5+qSMvOGgC9b94WGbHTsgQ5v21GMFwki6hfLHyZSyfc +dA/9LvWF1L9Og5uNXQqOzOOU5fa95+q5ZzzLwYUA9JwF+/RpHisvBDofCNtXx7X 0xKpn79pmkEsqhymzFxjxj9zYrUl3mmGudThQ0E6zn2giTTM2jqK/ygID4VognPW C/ucIKQlcPuVzo7KaSBY8mE2UhMjccftcvsj09XPnsxrfVSSlfMaIHC6dLyJvbr2 K34+IVOIJ5FqhzlRtx1X7kWpqe3NY4Ryr5LInxMH/lmnFMjm5+keylZM+wMzlEn1 8xGFBiycXDQ3gfeQ4n+bVLQAf5rXXgF+iG03mRwrSXae360KP+IxJJDyazcNn3SH VlIQ67o/05ES3HgZ/kirOosWIYQG47VD8ON2OVlfjz34P2G2fRWuJetMT6bLTMEc cw+j/yn2gLYBhxR6EAyz =27qK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
