On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 08:56:01 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2015 18:29:08 hasufell wrote: > > Patrick Lauer: > > > On 01/16/15 23:26, hasufell wrote: > > >> Patrick Lauer (patrick): > > >>> patrick 15/01/16 04:16:55 > > >>> > > >>> Modified: ChangeLog > > >>> Added: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild > > >>> Log: > > >>> Bump > > >> > > >> I expect people to ask me for review if they bump any of my packages. > > >> That includes QA team members. > > > > > > Are you always in such a bad mood? > > > > Do you, as QA team member, think that a review workflow improves quality? > > No. > > Bureaucracy does not improve quality by itself. This is not a formal bureaucracy, there are some rules to behave in community and these rules are supposed to be equal for everyone: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/ebuild-maintenance/index.html "Touching other developers ebuilds".
The fact that developer with QA team member mandate (even if it was not used in this case) intentionally violates this policy without even considering this action as something abnormal is very disturbing. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpjs_EYXoZJc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
