Dnia 2015-02-02, o godz. 11:00:59 Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> On 02/02/2015 10:50 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Maybe. Though it still will keep the confusion of !libav meaning ffmpeg. > > > > We could remove USE=libav from the tree, leaving only USE=ffmpeg. Then > ffmpeg_impl_libav would switch the implementation if USE=ffmpeg is enabled. Wasn't that your point in the first mail? > > Maybe a little cleaner but still relies on the implicit thing. Not to > > mention the user is supposed to set either: > > > > FFMPEG_IMPL=libav > > > > or: > > > > FFMPEG_IMPL= > > > > which is nowhere close to sane :). > > > > With only one flag, why bother with the USE_EXPAND? Because otherwise we're back to USE=libav, only named different and illegally as well (PMS sez _ is reserved for USE_EXPAND). -- Best regards, Michał Górny
pgpoluzNtkCla.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
