>>>>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, hasufell wrote: >>> +As an example: if you use <c>epatch</c> in your ebuild, you <b>must</b> >>> +inherit <c>eutils.eclass</c> directly, even if another eclass (like >>> distutils-r1) >>> +already inherits it. Exceptions to this policy must be discussed and >>> documented. >>> +</warning> >> >> Documented, maybe. But I don't want to discuss a feature of my >> eclasses which is in place since more than a decade and works >> flawlessly.
> What wording do you suggest instead? > Maybe "Exceptions to this policy are documented in the respective eclasses"? "Exceptions to this policy must be documented in the inheriting eclass." BTW, for new eclasses there should be a discussion in -dev anyway. Ulrich
pgpxODKDKKzUx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
