16.02.2015 14:44, Markos Chandras пишет: > On 02/16/15 13:31, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> Am Montag 16 Februar 2015, 06:13:10 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > >>> even then, deleting an ebuild purely due to different copyright >>> is complete bs. > >> The requirement for Gentoo copyright in the main tree is not >> optional, but has been policy for a very long time. > >> Just because you've been around forever doesnt mean you can break >> the rules that everyone else is supposed to follow. > > > I too believe that if you are reverting someone's commit you should at > least drop him an email to let him know. How else do you expect him to > know he did something wrong? I am a bit worried QA is taking such > actions without communicating that with the developer. If you don't > let people know they do mistakes, it's likely they will do them again. > >
This is clear violation of our QA policy and AGAIN, patrick is involved. @patrick: vapier claims that he was not aware about your actions. But according to our policy you should notify maintainer. At least in case of serious actions. I am sure that dropping package is a damn serious action. I am not sure how should i proceed. Your work for QA is much appreciated, but, think about this message as a first warning from me as QA team lead to you. Please, be more communicative with your fellow developers. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
