On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:57:13 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Andrew Savchenko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > While I must admit that travis is a quite convenient tool (thought > > it has its limitations), I'd like to raise related software freedom > > concern. > > > > Travis itself is a closed, proprietary and non-trivial-to-replace > > solution. > > > > Looks pretty open to me... https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci > Replacement may be non-trivial purely due to the large number > of components involved, but closed and proprietary are a bit > extreme.
Problem is not in replacement only. Travis is a GitHub lock-in: https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci README.markdown Without GitHub Travis is useless, as it can't be used with any other solution. And GitHub itself is closed. Do you aware of any local Travis setup out there? There are none to my knowledge. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpqeOw7z1r9G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
