-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/16/2015 09:25 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 17 July 2015 at 13:13, NP-Hardass <np-hard...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> Additionally, I feel that a signature is a means of acknowledging
>> that a package has been looked over, and that developer has
>> stated that they approve of the existing state
> 
> 
> That much is somewhat implied by a developer owning a commit.
> Because in git, single commits span multiple files.
> 
> There's GIT_COMMITER and GIT_AUTHOR values in every commit.
> 
> And a "Signature" is a digital proof that  Joe Bloggs didn't forge
> a commit, label it "NP-Hardass" and push it on to some server
> pretending to be NP-Hardass.
> 
> It might sound like a rubber stamping, but its no more rubber
> stamped than our current workflow where signature generation is
> automatic and having a signed manifest doesn't in fact mean it
> *has* been looked at, its only signing who touched it last.
> 
> For NSA to break a Manifest, they'd need to update an entry and
> resign it, and then we could later work out who signed what
> manifests if we had any problem
> 

Yeah, I understand that a signed manifest doesn't mean it's been
looked at.  My logic was that signing and keys is pretty prolific at
this point, so a signed manifest implied the package has been touched
(and hopefully looked at) by a dev more recently, and those that
aren't signed probably haven't been touched in a longer amount of time.

- -- 
NP-Hardass
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=tWk3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to