On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
>> practically useless.
>>
>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you
>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;).
>>
>> Let's just remove it.
>>
> 
> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which
> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to
> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be
> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features.
> 
If repoman supported adding a signedoffby line I'd likely use it more
for commits.  Still running repoman full before commit though.

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to