Hi!
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 9/20/15 1:23 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >
> >> [0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this
> >> scheme, at least for some more critical packages.
> > ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages.
>
> Exactly. So suppose that we do stabilize a non-critical package on an
> arch where it fails. We'll get a bug report for it and then deal with
> the issue. Its not ideal, i know, but it seems an acceptable compromise
> given manpower shortage. We tossed around an earlier version of the
> idea in ppc/ppc64 when we were struggling for manpower and we were
> getting council pressure to drop to ~arch.
This I am perfectly okay with; what I worry about is tree-level
breakage (missing deps/slots, for example).
Regards,
Tobias
--
Sent from aboard the Culture ship
(ex) General Transport Craft (Interstellar-class) Now We Try It My Way
