On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 04:52:51 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > >> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount > >> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and > >> not compatible with busybox. > > > > Does this have any actual end-user impact? AFAIK, using the -O > > switch was 'just added' by us originally (i think to reduce the > > explicit listing of the different fs types or otherwise simplify the > > init script code) right? I'm just wondering if this paragraph is > > actually necessary or not.. > > As a user, that para in the news makes me ask "how does this affect > me?". I have to go read man pages and init scripts to find out. > > Perhaps this: > > Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount -a, > because it is util-linux specific and not compatible with busybox. This > only affects mounts with "_netdev" listed under options in /etc/fstab. > Such systems should use "noauto" and/or "nofail" as described above.
Does anyone know how to solve the issue when depending on iSCSI devices? I had to add "_netdev" to ensure those would not fail during boot. -- Joost
