On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:54:30 -0700 Zac Medico <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 04:40 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:08:29 -0700 > > Zac Medico <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for > >>> sys-apps/systemd. > >>> > >>> It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the > >>> selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because > >>> the systemd use flag is also masked. > >>> > >>> That's perfectly fine and I suppose it is valid, but there is > >>> nothing I can do to resolve it and I don't need to be reminded of > >>> it every time I run repoman. > >>> > >>> Does anyone find dependency.badmasked useful? > >> > >> Possibly, if I wanted to see dependency issues for masked packages. > > > > > > why not also ignore *use.mask along with package.mask for this > > check ? > > > > Can you give a concrete example? I'm having a hard time thinking up a > reason to ignore use.mask. Well, ignoring completely use.mask won't work: people use it because the dep doesnt work and thus has missing keywords. But, maybe something in between could work: drop dependency.badmasked warnings that are satisfied when ignoring use.mask. Is there anything I'm missing ?
