On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:09:10 +0200 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:34:15 +0200 > Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:01:27 +0200 > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > > > It's trivial to change patch to -p1 (I think patchutils can do > > > > > that). > > > > > > > > It is. But the above cases were not whether it is possible, but > > > > rather desirable. > > > > > > Consistency is desirable. There is world outside ebuilds, and they > > > need to apply patches sometimes. > > > > Yes, that's why I find '-p1 relative to $S' inconsistent. Nothing > > wrong with -p1, but $S is from ebuild. If you avoid '$S', then you > > must also drop -p1, simple as that :) > > Relative to cwd. > which is the same, or even worse, since ebuilds can 'cd' whenever they want
