On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:19:32 +0200
Julian Ospald <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> The following patch tries to address the lack of slot
> documentation, since getting the slots of a dependency
> right seems like a common problem.
> 
> Things that I was particularly not sure about: the 'subslots'
> element. Having a sub-element for 'slot' seemed even more
> messy, so I tried to make this as simple as possible, so
> that maintainers don't get angry and give up when trying
> to document their slots. However, this is a little bit
> at the expense of correctness, because you cannot
> document different subslot naming schemes if they differ
> between slots of a single package (does such thing even exist
> in the tree?).
> 


btw, once this is committed, please consider adding or asking for a
repoman warning when subslot is defined but metadata.xml is not filled

Reply via email to