On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:19:32 +0200 Julian Ospald <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The following patch tries to address the lack of slot > documentation, since getting the slots of a dependency > right seems like a common problem. > > Things that I was particularly not sure about: the 'subslots' > element. Having a sub-element for 'slot' seemed even more > messy, so I tried to make this as simple as possible, so > that maintainers don't get angry and give up when trying > to document their slots. However, this is a little bit > at the expense of correctness, because you cannot > document different subslot naming schemes if they differ > between slots of a single package (does such thing even exist > in the tree?). > btw, once this is committed, please consider adding or asking for a repoman warning when subslot is defined but metadata.xml is not filled