On 10/19/2015 07:52 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 10/19/2015 07:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> >>> However, stabilizing a single package really is an impactful change. >>> The fact that you're doing 100 of them at one time doesn't really >>> diminish the impact of each one. Any of them could break a system or >>> need to be reverted. >>> >> >> Since when do we allow reverting stabilization? The package needs to be >> fixed and possibly revbumped instead. >> > > It would really depend on the nature of the break. If it is a serious > upstream problem and no fix is available, then reverting might be the > only practical solution. It is of course not a preferred solution. >
I don't think we depend on 'git revert' in that case. KEYWORDS are trivial changes (in terms of file diffs).
