On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:26:43 +0100 Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia 20 listopada 2015 11:19:35 CET, Alexis Ballier > <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:21:52 +0100 > >Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> And here you removed the newest version having ~ia64 keyword, > >breaking > >> revdeps: > >> > >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1061286/7.html#l885 > >> > >> I suggest you use eshowkw before removing packages. Please fix or > >> revert this. > > > >done; thx for the reminder > > > > > >feel free to revert such commits (at least mine) and send me an email > >so that i get notified something went wrong in the future > > > >PS: can't these checks/emails be automated ? it must be very boring > >to manually track the culprit from ci output > > Not one that I can think of. This usually requires looking at what > changed in both packages, and sometimes profiles. I don't want to > blame wrong people just because someone made an irrelevant commit in > a package. if CI runs after each commit, it should just be a matter of emailing the author when some new breakage appears
