-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/2015 1:45 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Yes, sorry my bad, repoman did not complain.
This is still not working because some packages, i.e sys-fs/ntfs3g, have a dependency like <dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.6.0:0 Brian > > On 1 December 2015 at 08:44, Michał Górny <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC) "Alon Bar-Lev" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3 Author: >>> Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Tue Dec >>> 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 Commit: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> >>> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 >>> URL: >>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1519f072 >>> >>> dev-libs/libgcrypt: cleanup >>> >>> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 >>> >>> dev-libs/libgcrypt/Manifest | 1 - >>> .../libgcrypt/files/libgcrypt-1.5.0-uscore.patch | 33 >>> --------- .../files/libgcrypt-1.5.4-clang-arm.patch | >>> 84 ---------------------- >>> dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1.ebuild | 57 >>> --------------- dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r100.ebuild >>> | 58 --------------- >> >> Isn't the point of compatibility slots like :11 there that they >> should be kept for binary packages to work? Because you just >> removed that, plus all 1.5* versions, effectively causing huge >> breakage: >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1193 >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1219 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1082 >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1108 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1134 >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1997 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l208 >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l234 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l249 >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l460 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l898 >> >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l2088 >> >> Please fix this ASAP and next time check reverse dependencies >> before removing packages. >> >> -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWX0pBAAoJENH3ge/59KO2paIP/2HD9sGS51V3SblZlC28YHLv 96eBOqlmaWbYlOPsHjYvnTot4B3bQauLeobAEWsmOQ5nTaPW1qPD2jjli6+p48lB KBlU1n6RP6JSoaTet5fiAxe65Ih4/rEb24de0MniF4pAtU6U+QP01wW59pHrgWlj pe6PafUtAiW7RdnoZ5t/QKmrnJYd1qYk7KsJMo+xZYqejKi6QJaURnrExI9A4X3e kxcDHOv1ugyQUW3SKOeyUXNi8Hxuhvod5ENYrPdIxWBvS4ncXgmh61vCfQCbTLY4 VbkMCh5mnnrbfWLRb2btucqP2N+PhAUkGh0rtD5ELNrmznWMDZoUuFD2SNEPZN8Q UOpEWbIIF2YfxMIukfPfibEJ4fWch8GnnOfhUwulitjLLZ1Cx+tFOlvWKFNxf0Fp Qo2LfWULiu220ocF6TAig3uCdWV0sL5qfCHGyno28aMfhXET81umzc1IHhWTeZcs jkCE6cq9HYybZ0wAGGp7IWoyqOnsrE3/0QubiLXICb48AhxuqRIeSmllfrmn+B4O K9l4+KQaX3pSuudakm23HaNVhpRaAq/OjX1phTXJO8EvAjgyWv0TKVMihrSp5dDj smINjuwHkV3PnK5L3c+enNT9P65sZrNAU1IqoDtVpGzJgEyZyZ/gD7QYBUFcj69/ bqHlLvtROzoUv4/S8R0E =zvh3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
