>>>>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>> > # EAPI=4 is required for meaningful MULTILIB_USEDEP.
>> > case ${EAPI:-0} in
>> > - 4|5) ;;
>> > + [456]) ;;
>> > *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;;
>> > esac
>>
>> Why not write this as 4|5|6) for better readability? It's not even
>> shorter with the brackets.> Or [4-6]) perhaps? It would not get any longer for later versions. ;) I'd rather avoid any syntax that suggests that EAPI names are single characters. Ulrich
pgpx23LZu9eYj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
