On 2016-01-23 09:48, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/23/2016 07:26 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > > In regards to: > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f > > > > I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also > > considering adding a new USE_EXPAND as well that would control the > > specific slots the user would like to build PostgreSQL-related > > extensions against. > > > > Any objections? > > > > There are three other USE_EXPAND with a similar aim: > > * PHP_TARGETS > * PYTHON_TARGETS > * RUBY_TARGETS > > And the related, > > * QEMU_SOFTMMU_TARGETS > * QEMU_USER_TARGETS > > If the "_TARGETS" suffix isn't somehow wrong in this context, having it > might act as a little bit of documentation for users who are used to the > variables above.
Good point. POSTGRES_TARGETS it is. Any objections or comments to that?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
