On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:48:22 +0200 Mart Raudsepp <[email protected]> wrote:
[...] > However one concern with the virtual - if it is not interchangeable > (same library naming and ABI), then you have to rebuild things against > the other provider, and hopefully that can be set up to be more > automatic somehow; as the virtual will be satisfied with either of > them, so the user could exchange them without actual consumers linking > to it noticing. Some thoughts into that aspect, if even just some > warning to user, would be good. Yes, the point is that is has same library name and ABI. Diffing installed headers show a very few symbols that are jack2 only, but packages needing them should depend on jack2 not the virtual, if there are any.
