Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 11 Feb 2016 07:55:52 -0500 as excerpted: > Now, auto-unmask could still propose sticking USE=+foo in your > package.use if you have USE=-foo in your make.conf, which is already the > behavior today. If you've made any explicit USE setting in your > configuration, portage would never ignore it, but only suggest that you > change it.
So my USE="-* ..." (without letting portage do autounmasking) would continue to work just like it does now, correct? Because I allow neither profile USE flags nor profile @system packages (all such profile entries and package-based default-use are negated), here, and my package.use files contain only specific exceptions to my global USE policy settings, together with (generally date-stamped) comments justifying exactly why that exception is there. By definition, then, If I haven't specifically set USE=flag, my system policy is USE=-flag, and I want to know about and specifically setup any exceptions (or if justified change my system policy), so I can set the justification notes at the same time. Because I'd be rather put out at anyone suggesting that I have to specifically -flag each individual flag I want to be hard off, not squishy off, as that's all the flags I've not specifically set hard on. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
