On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The games team was pretty much formed of two kinds of developers back then. > One kind was retired developers, the other kind was developers who did what > they cared about and ignored everything and everyone else. Bugs, join > requests, complaints, all went ignored and games team kept silent claim to > games in gentoo. False and slanderous. > So the first Council case against games team was that they did not accept any > new members. Or rather, silently ignored join requests. They also ignored > inquiries wrt the case and the Council. Also false. > The result was that the Council set up someone external to take care of > inviting new members, and electing new team lead afterwards. As it could be > predicted, nobody wanted to join, or rather be forced into the team they > weren't welcome in. Speculative and false. > Then the case against policies started. The first abolished myth was games > team sole claim to games in gentoo. Where Council pretty much only confirmed > that they have no right for that and everyone can maintain game ebuilds > without having games team approval or co-maintenance. Making things up. > During the whole process, I don't recall a single reply from games team > member. Well, here's at least one. However, I'm not sure why anyone would reply to your drama, slander, and lies so I'm not surprised that's been your experience.