On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:09:38 -0400 [email protected] wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:11:31AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote > > > It was simply a recognition that we were already in a state where > > booting a system without /usr mounted early can cause problems. > > For certain edge cases... yes. But they were already using > initramfs or merging /usr into /. I'm talking about the 95% who > don't really need it.
Booting without /usr mounted early is something Gentoo already doesn't support and can't support, right?
