On 18/04/16 16:47, Michał Górny wrote: > This is invalid. Replacing invalid package names with other invalid > names is no fix. It is ugly Gentoo-style hackery which proves that > developers prefer trying randomly changing something until QA check > doesn't trigger over reading the documentation. As a result, now > a number packages with visible QA issues have been turned into a number > of packages with QA issues that aren't caught by the schema due to > regexp limitations. > > Please go over all the packages you've touched and fix the silent > issues you introduced. I can't afford to waste more time writing more > complex QA checks that are going to cover all the ways Gentoo > developers can screw up such a simple thing as package *name*. > I can't help but want to write .. "If you want a job doing ... "
+1 monp.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
