No fun allowed On May 14, 2016 12:06 PM, "Rich Freeman" <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:59 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.ever...@iee.org> > wrote: > > On 14/05/16 17:53, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > >> Gordon Pettey schrieb: > >> > >>> So, it's perfectly okay to make direct commits of obviously broken > >>> code that > >>> has no chance of working, because community something mumble... > >> > >> You may have missed some sarcasm in the post which you replied to. > >> Plus, I don't think anybody said or implied that committing broken > >> things is ok. > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > >> > > I think the time is coming, given the diversity of members of this list, > > to add <sarcasm></sarcasm> tags when we are not describing something > > literally. It becomes very difficult to follow the thread of > > conversation when people are (not) communicating their true thoughts!! > > > > While this is certainly sensible, the irony here is that this whole > discussion was started by somebody making a sarcastic remark when > simply pointing out a mistake would have been just as functional. > > Nobody thinks it is ok to commit broken code. What it seems like > we'll be debating until there is only one of us left is how > unprofessional we should be when pointing that out. > > -- > Rich > >
