-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 17/06/16 15:58, Rich Freeman wrote: > That could actually be generalized. I could see many types of > bugs where the issue is with upstream, and we might want to track > the progress as upstream implements a fix, releases it, and then it > is stabilized on Gentoo. So, maybe we need another state to track > in upstream's VCS vs the Gentoo repo. > > Another approach would be to distinguish between portage as a > Gentoo-hosted upstream, and portage as a package in the Gentoo > repo. The same could apply to any Gentoo-hosted project. I would be fine with either, but honestly this whole thing seems like bikeshedding for the sake of bikeshedding. It's working fine as-is, and I don't recall any complaints that we've been doing it differently to the tree. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXZAJ5AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BXdsQAIvWgBxy/43BFRfVYk5Ah6ke u0yosJvHJe+PWTPQj6YQNJDgmLwohNeyyrDkV4y6PCrObZWkiJgT34LATmJLThCY C+/ZGuxxSjhYJkO3dU51rc6KCXdQ+Uw7Mvc/jxXzB27nuSA1nfKsw2MRfH6Snhdz hGNYiXe8xry+G1t6BBC2BENrZyRdn/KL6T+0bmc0it6iCvfEWjjKSMmS1GUTPK6G 6cD7IOmWVJTl1o9fjM0Em78UlqU8LsyeZLSq+W63crRVhhv1ZzbXHWMG+jRq64dO jmI/qnScC0EnhMg2GYxaiHlo/CRcfFQxvSdqCZC5Ll7bnE0ygYaeA1huhXKg2Qgq ibwN8+1s7j/O50lOqFcVYb6GFvUrObA0Db/k1YcVNENsgr5krBQLRrWOiq5pBJ1g ubFP1G6G5xT1wHmf9j3Cd4DKv2IdVP6u//x+TMhP4utcCbszNyH5tQ6mlPE6Z7i0 YRHXODCiRrdHDr6+TZRTq1/nH0wnhSi7yrlU8lbyMsTAXRsWEDPvc4Y+rvVk70Xn OzGHJcMJzCleNcPd3j+9Oqcb2m/hJY0I+70/OnQwcVVUnEzqyM6FAsca0PlIPA8T lEBZyMYtxewB2znMY4cbiLalVVeDBOYvQcS37ygjdxfChJTnZfMgPMM9ffGcXxZ9 7p2rOSvWrDR9i4RqCY6d =vcMe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
