On 06/30/2016 06:02 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for >> decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that >> want games on other media (such as an SSD or separate HDD), or wish to >> restrict the use of games on their system to certain accounts? > > Has anyone complained about either of these features going away? If > they're purely theoretical concerns... > > The games.eclass saga has gone on plenty long enough. I would much > prefer that we not relitigate it. I understand that you may not have > been around when most of it happened initially, but please understand > that it's not feasible to reconsider every decision when new > developers join the project. > I understand where you're coming from, but a lack of yelling or complaining isn't logically equivalent to consensus. It's a fair point to make, though. We don't know until we ask, so I'll post something on gentoo-user about it.
I also understand that I'm new and we're not special. I'm not sure where I conveyed that. It's healthy to look back and reassess or reconsider decisions. Policies, standards, or even accurate consensus can't be assessed unless they're checked every once in a while. If there are other strange decisions you feel need attention, I'm all eyes. :) ~zlg -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
