Hello all, We, like almost everyone else and presumably upstream, install PCRE 8 as libpcre.so.1. Debian, for reasons best known to themselves, install it as libpcre.so.3. With Ubuntu still being the most widely accepted "standard" Linux desktop, this presents a problem when dealing with pre-compiled binaries.
I have been working on a script to replace the rather lacking steam-games-meta ebuild (see steam-overlay). I'm very excited about releasing it soon as I think it is a major step forwards in our ability to easily run Steam without the official Ubuntu-based runtime. Before I put it out there, I'd like to get Alien Isolation working properly. It links to libpcre.so.3. Hacking the binary might work but this isn't ideal and not always an option as some games use Valve's anti-cheat system, which is ruthless. I have found that creating a symlink in /usr/lib that points to /lib/libpcre.so.1 works, except that when you run ldconfig, it automatically creates another symlink from /usr/lib/libpcre.so.1 to libpcre.so.3. If you create the first symlink in /lib instead then the existing /lib/libpcre.so.1 holds after running ldconfig. The latter location is therefore probably preferable. Would anyone have any issue with adding this to our libpcre package? I don't foresee any problems. libpcre.so would obviously still point to libpcre.so.1. I'm pretty sure there will never be another libpcre.so.3 as upstream have released PCRE2 as libpcre2, effectively an entirely separate library. I could create a Steam-specific package for this but that would mean adding some additional Steam-specific location to ld.so.conf, which I'm trying to avoid. It would be nice to solve this generally anyway. Thoughts? -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpLo5hr1jlUL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
