Oops, I saw your second draft later :S El lun, 22-08-2016 a las 14:03 -0500, William Hubbs escribió: > > [...] > If you have any service scripts after running this command that > generate > this warning, please file bugs against the packages that own these > scripts, not against OpenRC.
How risk is the change from #!/sbin/runscript to #!/sbin/openrc-run? Can it be done "blindly" simply changing from one to another? In that case it seems not so many packages are pending and, maybe, we could fix them instead of telling people to report bugs once they find the obsolete init.d files (and then wait for each package to get that fixed... and re-emerge that version) $ grep -r "/sbin/runscript" */*/files/* app-admin/prelude-manager/files/prelude-manager.initd:#!/sbin/runscript app-emulation/lxc/files/lxc.initd.4:#!/sbin/runscript app-emulation/lxd/files/lxd-2.0.1.initd:#!/sbin/runscript app-misc/lirc/files/irexec-initd:#!/sbin/runscript net-analyzer/prelude-correlator/files/prelude- correlator.initd:#!/sbin/runscript net-analyzer/prelude-lml/files/prelude-lml.initd:#!/sbin/runscript www-apps/grafana-bin/files/grafana.initd:#!/sbin/runscript www-apps/grafana-bin/files/grafana.initd.2:#!/sbin/runscript There are only a few we could fix just now if we can simply replace the line
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
