On 06/09/16 14:35, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 03:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:
>>> I believe you're overthinking it, if we make it a guideline to include a
>>> section of the eclass (as many already have) that does e.g (take this
>>> for example purposes) there is no EAPI/PMS change needed
>>> case "${EAPI:-0}" in
>>> 4|5|6)
>>> ;;
>>> *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;;
>>>
>> I think the question becomes then what do we do about eclasses that
>> don't follow the guideline?
> A natural step might be QA team involved in such cases?
>
Did you just volunteer to join QA there, Kristian ?! ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
