On 18/02/17 20:03, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 18.02.2017 kell 19:47, kirjutas Michał Górny: >> commit: 7207a292b2591dde5cbd336470bed3c11617a8e1 >> Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> >> CommitDate: Sat Feb 18 19:47:25 2017 +0000 >> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7207 >> a292 >> >> dev-util/wxglade: python-single-r1, EAPI=6 > While I appreciate work done to do this conversion finally, what was > the reason to bypass the maintainers after being explicitly told on IRC > to not do so? > Since when have we entered a free-for-all state of maintenance in > Gentoo? > I would like to know the state of affairs, so I know for future > reference what can I expect and what I can do to packages that I do not > explicitly maintain either. > > And yes, I am aware there was a pending bump request for a couple > years. I'm still dealing with backlog after getting back to tree > maintenance. > > > Mart Raudsepp, > thoroughly confused about current maintenance policies > I would also argue why wasn't this revbumped at the same time, if the package was touched -at all-. This is a package I've been interested in as a user for a couple of years now, but not having the required knowledge, hadn't touched it to update. 0.6.3 is -ancient- and unsupported upstream. In fact, I have been instrumental in fixing a few bugs in the 0.7-series upstream, but could not bring these releases to Gentoo because of the reasons mentioned.
Equally mystified, Michael/veremit.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
