On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:

>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler:
>> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do
>> any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so
>> badly.
>> Now QA again wants to do a questionable action _without_ any approval
>> from neither infra nor council.  
>[snip]
>
>October 2014 council meeting:
>
>Can we drop CVS headers post-migration?
>Aye: blueness, creffett (proxy for ulm), dberkholz, dilfridge,
>radhermit, rich0, williamh 
>
>
>
>

$Id$ is _NOT_ the CVS header.

-- 
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93  9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Attention! New gpg key! See
https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html

Attachment: pgpL6ISAlDEuc.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Reply via email to