On 03/02/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>
>>> This is why we can't have nice things.
>>
>> For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make --with-bdeps
>> automatically enabled when possible:
>>
> 
> 
> I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for DEPEND
> at all. It creates one more dangerous "it works in portage!" situation
> that will plague users of other package managers.
> 
> (I'm not saying it couldn't be useful, but it should go in the next EAPI
> if we're gonna do it.)

PMS doesn't specify when rebuilds are supposed to be triggered. You can
consider the rebuilds as a means to satisfy the dependencies. Saying
that the package manager should not make an effort to satisfy
dependencies would be silly.
-- 
Thanks,
Zac

Reply via email to