On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:06:54 -0500 Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2. Work with the PMS team to come up with a solution for the > problem. I think dependency labels & parts fill nicely that void. I have not done proper research about it but I have yet to see a serious proposal for its inclusion though. [...] > "How do we update insecure libraries?" would have been a good question > to ask *before* adding Go to the tree, because the answer is pretty > clearly "we can't." The right way to fix it now is to create a new > class of dependencies for the CADT languages that ignore the last 40 > years of experience and statically link everything. Keep in mind that some languages do not play that well with the DSO model. Curryfication and partial function applications come to mind. Those are also part of these 40 years of experience :) Alexis.
