On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 15:33 -0400, Yury German wrote: > I would prefer PPC and for that matter arm (which are no longer > security > supported) going the Non-stable route. This would prevent the need > for > stabilization and everything but @system we can instruct the users to > use ~ppc. > > This would also allow for security to not drop it from security > supported arches and just follow a more relaxed policy for non-stable > packages. > > For those not familiar, we (security) only need to have the package > in > tree and the vulnerable packages dropped, which is easily > accomplished > by the maintainer with no need for arches to get involved. > > Yury German (BlueKnight)
This solution doesn't go far enough for me - mainly because it still makes KEYWORDREQs a pain.
