On pon, 2017-05-29 at 12:10 +0300, nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote: > On 2017-05-29, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > > from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC. > > > > Removals: > > app-editors/vim-qt 20170525-10:36 mgorny 1aff8d7da4e > > This was announced here in April[1]. As soon as it was announced, Gordon > Pettey commented here[2] that upstream was fine. > > A quick inspection to the $HOMEPAGE seems to point out that, at some > point, the bitbucket repository was the main one, and github was a > "mirror". But, by looking at the github mirror[3], it looks like > upstream has been quite active, just not in bitbucket. > > The README at github also hints that this is for Vim 8, which seems to > be the in-tree version of Vim. > > The move to github was also mentioned in gentoo bug 607136[4], > comment 2. > > Why was this last-rited with the reasoning of "Doesn't work with any > in-tree versions of vim. Inactive upstream.", when upstream seems to be > active *and* this was mentioned both on the mailing list and on > bugzilla?
Because apparently nobody cared enough to fix the core issue (bump it). If you want it back, you are free to re-add it. > [1] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149294484724875 > [2] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149295586026533&w=2 > [3] https://github.com/equalsraf/vim-qt/commits/master > [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607136 > -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
