> Can phantomjs be simply masked for a longer period until the development
> world has had an opportunity to catch up?
Just exactly what I thought.
Although, in-tree version is obsolete anyway, and upstream made few next
releases with brain-exploding buildsystem, so I just pushed 9999 version to my
"public sandbox" overlay, and happy with it on the projects that depends on
phantomjs.
By the way, headless chrome, well, work a bit different in comparsion with
"analogs" (including wkhtmlto{img,pdf}), so, it needs much more time than a
month to get full analogs.
So, I'm disagree with monthly dropping in this context too (well, I disagree
with the idea. As I just said, I by myself is in safe from being affected by
it).
