On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote: > > Except that there is no machines using it. In all contexts, using full URL > for machine readability is better as it works with all software out of the > box. >
Until the domain name of the bugzilla server changes/etc. Even if we migrated all the old bugs the URLs would break. That might be an argument for not having a full URL. There would also be less variation. Bug: 123456 is pretty unambiguous as a reference. When you start having http vs https and maybe a few different ways of creating a URL to a bug it could get messier. That said, I really don't have a strong opinion on this. -- Rich
