On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 08/15/2017 11:33 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: >> Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) >>> On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: >>>>>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' >>>>> This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver. >>> >>> Can the "minimum"-use flag be utilized here? >>> >> Sounds reasonable and is worth thinking about. At least we could define the >> meaning of "minimum" here in metadata.xml. >> >> But, looking through portage there seems to be no "minimum" use flag anymore. >> Seems it got dropped for some reasons. >> > > typo; "minimal"...
The meaning of the minimal flag varies considerably throughout the tree. It is common only because its meaning morphs from package to package. For example, could you say that a client-only install that still installs the X11 components is "minimal?" -- Rich
