2017-10-13 4:05 GMT+02:00 M. J. Everitt <m.j.ever...@iee.org>:
> On 12/10/17 22:24, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit
> > which is a lagging behind upstream.
> > However package app-arch/rpm (from which debugedit is forked) always
> > install the same binary in ${ROOT}/usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit.
> >
> > In 2017 I don't see much value in maintaining a fork from a package
> > (rpm) that weight less than 3MB when the functionality we need is
> > already all upstreamed. But if there is someone willing to keep it up to
> > date, that's totally fine.
> >
> > Provided we^W you keep dev-util/debugedit indefinitely it's possible to
> > provide more useful choices to the users with at least two courses of
> > action:
> >
> > 1) instruct ${package_manager} to search for `debugedit` first in
> > ${PATH} _and_ then in /usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit.
> > This way dev-util/debugedit take precedence, if it's not installed and
> > app-arch/rpm is, then the latter will be used.
> >
> > 2) optionally (via useflag) create a symlink in /usr/bin to the libexec
> > debugedit when installing rpm. Obviously the two package must block each
> > other.
> > the rpm package implementing this solution (revbumped to latest) is
> > available here:
> > https://github.com/vivo75/vivovl/blob/master/app-arch/
> rpm/rpm-4.14.0.ebuild
> >
> > thanks for reading and please share your thoughts
> >
> > -- Francesco (vivo) Riosa
> >
> Sounds to me like a potential case of a 'virtual/debugedit' package,
> depending on one of rpm or debugedit to be installed, perhaps?
>
> MJE
>
It would be, but debugedit has no dependency in tree, so it's all
manageable from the messages portage send to the user.
