Hi Aaron, Aaron Bauman <b...@gentoo.org> writes:
> I am not too familair with prefix other than the purpose of it (e.g. I > have never built it), but is there a better naming standard for the > profiles? I understand the need to distinguish between the kernel and > glibc versions. > Is there a standard I am missing for profile names? From PMS, there is no words on profile naming. But I think adopting naming of category [A-Za-z0-9+_.-] will not be too wrong: https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-170003.1.1 > Could there be a wiki explaining a prefix profile versioning that > correlates to the glibc and kernel versions? Or is the intent to keep > it simple and easily identifiable from within the PM? A wiki page would be a good idea for detailed explanations. > Not a big deal, but just my thoughts. Thanks for your work on prefix > and I am sure many will benefit from the new profiles :) Thanks for inputs! Yours, Benda
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature