January 11, 2018 9:52 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 11/01/2018 08:43, Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> I always was under the impression the following order (and explanation) >> was the case: >> >> stable -> development -> experimental >> >> For this reason, e.g. Prefix profiles are (still) experimental, which >> means they really shouldn't bother non-Prefix people. Prefix users and >> developers work on an environment where those profiles are promoted to >> development ones, such that repoman kicks in for their work. (At least >> that was the idea.) >> >> I see you (re-)define dev as "developer's playground", and I wonder if >> in that case it wouldn't be better to introduce a new one instead? >> >> Maybe I'm just one of a few who thinks the order is reversed now. > > The stable -> dev -> exp order also feels more natural to me. > > I don't have a strong opinion on this though. > > Paweł I got the impression that it was indeed stable -> development -> experimental with dev as in development, it seemed logical to put it between stable and experimental. But now that I read these comments I wonder if it wasnt supposed to be called 'developers' and then the other way round makes sense too. -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
