On 08/02/18 22:13, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:55:02PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> However, there are plenty of examples of commands that normal users >> may run from sbin. Moving these commands often causes problems for >> packages that either hard code absolute paths, or detect paths at >> build time. I think it would be less disruptive to add sbin to PATH >> than it would be to try and "fix" all the packages that install >> commands in the wrong place. > There are no reasons to remove the *sbin directories from PATH; I know > of no other distros that do this. > > William > Pardon my ignorance, but does that mean you are essentially relying on file system features/permissions and security settings to enforce correct use of system tools?! Or is this just to make sudo/etc commands 'more convenient' ?!
MJE
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
