W dniu śro, 25.07.2018 o godzinie 01∶28 -0400, użytkownik Joshua Kinard napisał: > On 7/8/2018 2:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Replace the 'Gentoo subkey' term that might wrongly suggest that > > the developers are expected to create an additional, dedicated subkey > > for Gentoo. > > > > Suggested-by: Kristian Fiskerstrand <[email protected]> > > --- > > glep-0063.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/glep-0063.rst b/glep-0063.rst > > index 0773e3b..f02537d 100644 > > --- a/glep-0063.rst > > +++ b/glep-0063.rst > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Recommendations > > > > a. Root key: 3 years maximum, expiry date renewed annually. > > > > - b. Gentoo subkey: 1 year maximum, expiry date renewed every 6 months. > > + b. Signing subkey: 1 year maximum, expiry date renewed every 6 months. > > > > 5. Create a revocation certificate & store it hardcopy offsite securely > > (it's about ~300 bytes). > > > > I lost track of this due to other priorities, but picking through some of the > follow-up messages about the lead time on renewals and all, I don't have a > problem with that. But why is the maximum of one year on subkey/signing key > expiration still here?
Because I've started with small changes, and the thing you're asking about is changed in a followup patch. Please read the final text instead of wrongly assuming something from irrelevant change. > > I'm not seeing a lot of additional follow-up on that, but that is still too > short. Two years is perfectly fine in this case. I'd prefer three years > myself, but am willing to compromise for two. I am not doing one year unless > someone drops some really convincing logic on me. And no, scrawling "logic" > on > the side of an anvil doesn't count. > > Does anyone know what the other projects require for their keys? Without a > proper explanation of //why// one year needs to be the maximum, looking to > what > other projects use seems sensible for guidance. > > I can't seem to find any specific guidance from Debian, but FreeBSD appears to > be fine with three years on their committer keys: > > """ > A three year key lifespan is short enough to obsolete keys weakened by > advancing computer power, but long enough to reduce key management problems. > """ > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.html#pgpkeys > -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
