On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 13:05:56 -0500 Marty E. Plummer wrote: [...] > It seems that every last person commenting on this is talking mcrypt, > not mhash, which is what I mentioned in the first place. As far as I can > tell, these are entirely differnt projects which just happen to have a > similar name.
Yes, they are. But it this very case I'm interested in mcrypt status, not mhash, that's why I changed the subject field of this discussion. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpZBs6CP4JXU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
